The first authentic photograph is the fixing of a camera
obscura image. The means of fixing an image is all that distinguishes a
photograph from a projected image. is the camera a faithful representation of what the eye sees? no its not, in my opinion, it is a still image of something that, when the eye saw it was a moving, breathing, living landscape. a photograph cant show you truly how momentous a mountain is. it can show you a scale, even place a person next to it but it cant replicate the sense of scale you would get if you were stood there.
The difference between photographs and paintings is more
than a matter of their resemblance to things or even their resemblance to each
other. Often a painting is said to be 'photographic' when it is realistic. Yet
we know that photographs may not appear to be realistic. To understand the
significance of the photograph to the modern age we need to remember that it is
a special kind of indexical sign - that it bears the imprint of its subject as
light. This being so we can say that the photograph has something in common
with other indexical signs such as a footprint in the sand. In this sense the
photograph is the equivalent of the cast - and casting, in the tradition of
sculpture, was understood as a form of mechanical reproduction.
- conventional signs/ image - letters, punctuation, words etc
- iconic signs/ image - pictures
indexical signs - indicate something: shadow indexical of a man, smoke is indexical of fire, footprint indexical that a foot has been there.
indexical signs are evidence of presence
simulacrum is a copy without an original.
No comments:
Post a Comment